Featured Posts

Chase Bank Limits Cash Withdrawals, Bans International... Before you read this report, remember to sign up to for 100% free stock alerts Chase Bank has moved to limit cash withdrawals while banning business customers from sending...

Read more

Richemont chairman Johann Rupert to take 'grey gap... Billionaire 62-year-old to take 12 months off from Cartier and Montblanc luxury goods groupRichemont's chairman and founder Johann Rupert is to take a year off from September, leaving management of the...

Read more

Cambodia: aftermath of fatal shoe factory collapse... Workers clear rubble following the collapse of a shoe factory in Kampong Speu, Cambodia, on Thursday

Read more

Spate of recent shock departures by 50-something CEOs While the rising financial rewards of running a modern multinational have been well publicised, executive recruiters say the pressures of the job have also been ratcheted upOn approaching his 60th birthday...

Read more

UK Uncut loses legal challenge over Goldman Sachs tax... While judge agreed the deal was 'not a glorious episode in the history of the Revenue', he ruled it was not unlawfulCampaign group UK Uncut Legal Action has lost its high court challenge over the legality...

Read more

Letters: Dutch election could offer lessons for Labour and the left

Category : Business

According to the Dutch Socialist party‘s magazine, the party advocates a new Europe of a “real democracy close to people, with space for local culture and identity based on social policy for the whole EU” (Extremes find common cause, 10 September). The model of centre parties defending our democracy against extremist parties of the left and right is more a product of ideology than reality. To compare the Socialist party, which will – if elected to participate in the government today – make society more liberal and more social, with the fascist Freedom party is beyond comprehension. History should have taught us by now that all anti-fascists and democrats should stand together against the racist ideology of the new and not-so-new right.

The lack of a political party in Britain like the Dutch Socialist party, the United Left in Spain, Syriza in Greece or Germany’s Die Linke tells us much about the poverty of our political culture.
Andreas Wiesner
Macclesfield, Cheshire

• Gavin Kelly’s perceptive view of the 2015 election (Casting ahead to 2015, no leader likes what he sees, 10 September) refers to “fairness in austerity – fertile terrain for Miliband”. Labour can win the election outright with an emphasis on fairness and justice as the dominant themes of the manifesto and campaign. By stressing how much of the failure of the austerity programme can only be described by adjectives of exactly opposite meaning, and how none of it was in the Tory manifesto, Ed Miliband can win on the “fairness” ticket.

Putting forward policies which promote fairness – such as restoring the 50% band, perhaps at £140,000, appointing more tax inspectors and increasing corporate transparency, introducing a Tobin tax and a creating nationalised bank for investment in small businesses – could be a vote-winner. Let’s start with the conference speech, Ed.
Bernie Evans

• Peter Wilby (Comment, 6 September) advises the Labour leader to move away from the centre ground. I would suggest that Ed Miliband looks at history, rather than listening to the wishful thinking of Mr Wilby and others who promote this view. Since the great reforming Attlee government, only two Labour leaders have won general elections, both unashamed pragmatists. Harold Wilson won four times (one as a minority government) and Tony Blair won three (handsomely).

I have no doubt that he would have won another in 2010, had he not been pushed out – mainly by the Tory press, which knew it would never beat him. Remember, his last victory was in 2005, two years after the invasion of Iraq. Unfortunately, the Labour left swallowed the Tory press line – believing, for some reason, that Gordon Brown, the friend of the City, was somehow to the left of Blair.

Labour leaders elected to move the party to the left – Foot (rather than Healey), Kinnock (rather than Hattersley) – made the party unelectable. Kinnock could not even defeat John Major, whom the Tories had set up as the fall guy for an expected defeat. Unfortunately, there has always been a body of Labour supporters who prefer to

Penny Stock Picks

AdultProdigy: ?


Post to Twitter

Post a comment