SAO PAULO, BRAZIL–(Marketwired – May 14, 2013) – CCR S.A. (CCR) (
Read the original here: Results for the 1st Quarter of 2013
The Top Penny Stocks newsletter for active penny stocks investors looking for penny stocks and pink sheet stocks
Richemont chairman Johann Rupert to take 'grey gap... Billionaire 62-year-old to take 12 months off from Cartier and Montblanc luxury goods groupRichemont's chairman and founder Johann Rupert is to take a year off from September, leaving management of the...
Cambodia: aftermath of fatal shoe factory collapse... Workers clear rubble following the collapse of a shoe factory in Kampong Speu, Cambodia, on Thursday
Spate of recent shock departures by 50-something CEOs While the rising financial rewards of running a modern multinational have been well publicised, executive recruiters say the pressures of the job have also been ratcheted upOn approaching his 60th birthday...
UK Uncut loses legal challenge over Goldman Sachs tax... While judge agreed the deal was 'not a glorious episode in the history of the Revenue', he ruled it was not unlawfulCampaign group UK Uncut Legal Action has lost its high court challenge over the legality...
Eurozone crisis live: Japan's strong growth figures... PM Shinzo Abe's stimulus package could generate feelgood factor needed to end two decades of stagnant growthPhillip Inman
Category : Stocks, World News
SAO PAULO, BRAZIL–(Marketwired – May 14, 2013) – CCR S.A. (CCR) (
Read the original here: Results for the 1st Quarter of 2013
Conservatives succeeded in blocking a Lords amendment to tighten up laws which allow corporations to stifle free speech
The Conservatives have succeeded in their attempt to water down defamation laws which would have prevented large companies ranging from McDonald’s to Tesco from suing their critics unless they could prove financial losses.
The Conservatives won a vote in the House of Commons to remove a House of Lords amendment to the defamation bill to tighten up the laws which critics say allow corporations to stifle free speech.
But during the Commons debate, the justice secretary Helen Grant promised to reconsider the amendment after the vote to get the support of the Liberal Democrats.
But Labour denounced Grant’s concession as a sham and it is almost certain the Liberal Democrat peer Lord Lester, who has led a three-year battle for libel reform, will move to reinstate the amendment when the bill returns to the Lords.
After losing the vote 298 to 230, shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said: “The government gave the impression there would be last minute concessions but this has proved false.”
Labour MP Paul Farrelly said “the issue here is not just about big corporations which want to bully like McDonalds intimidating the little people just because they could … it’s also about the desire of big businesses to silence its critics”. He said big corporations used the libel laws “to take journalist out of the game”.
Tracey Brown from Sense about Science which has campaigned for doctors and scientists who have been sued after they criticised big health companies said she was “deeply disappointed” the clause was removed but that support from many MPs on the issue had led to the government concession.
The amendment also included a clause, now struck out, which would have banned local councils and their subcontractors from suing anyone who criticised them in their performance of public duties, paid for by the taxpayer.
Tory MP Sir Peter Bottomley made an impassioned plea with his fellow politicians not to vote to remove this clause said that although case law had established, under the so-called Derbyshire principle, that councils could not sue, this did not extend to private companies such as Atos Healthcare, a company employed by the department of work and pensions, which has threatened disability blogs and websites with legal action.
Agreeing with Bottomley, Khan said: “Just because a school, prison or hospital is run by a private company doesn’t mean it should be insulated from public criticism.”
English PEN, whose campaign for libel reform has been backed by high-profile figures including Stephen Fry and William Boyd said: “We’re depending on the Lords now to deliver the reform that all the parties signed up to.
“It’s essential that companies are no longer allowed to exploit libel law to bully whistleblowers into silence. This has always been a key demand for the campaign.”
LONDON, ENGLAND–(Marketwire – Feb. 5, 2013) - Condor (AIM:CNR), a gold exploration company focused on delineating a large commercial reserve on its 100%-owned, CIM compliant Mineral Resource of 2,375,000 oz gold at 4.6g/t at La India Project in Nicaragua, is pleased to announce the acquisition of 100% of the 86.4 sq km ‘HEMCO-SRP-NS’ Concession (the “HEMCO Concession”) from HEMCO Nicaragua SA (“HEMCO”) for a consideration of US$275,000 payable by way of issuing new ordinary shares in Condor Gold plc at £2.00 per share. The acquisition of the HEMCO Concession increases the Company’s La India Project area to 280 sq km from 194 sq km.
Visit link: Condor Gold Acquires HEMCO Concession and Extends La India Project
THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO–(Marketwire – Dec. 12, 2012) - QRS Capital Corp. (TSX VENTURE:QRS) (“QRS” or the “Company”) wishes to correct previous statements made regarding its San Felix Project in Chile. It has been brought to the Company’s attention that its legal due diligence and landman service in Chile incorrectly identified a concession named San Agustin 1-10 covering a total of 90 hectares as being part of the Company’s San Felix Project. The Company would like to clarify that the option agreement through which the Company holds the San Felix Project does not include the land covered by the San Agustin 1-10 concession and the Company does not have any right or title to such concession. The Company’s San Felix Project still consists of 23 mining concessions for a total of 2,380 hectares.
Read the original: QRS Capital San Felix Land Claim Correction