Featured Posts

Chase Bank Limits Cash Withdrawals, Bans International... Before you read this report, remember to sign up to for 100% free stock alerts Chase Bank has moved to limit cash withdrawals while banning business customers from sending...

Read more

Richemont chairman Johann Rupert to take 'grey gap... Billionaire 62-year-old to take 12 months off from Cartier and Montblanc luxury goods groupRichemont's chairman and founder Johann Rupert is to take a year off from September, leaving management of the...

Read more

Cambodia: aftermath of fatal shoe factory collapse... Workers clear rubble following the collapse of a shoe factory in Kampong Speu, Cambodia, on Thursday

Read more

Spate of recent shock departures by 50-something CEOs While the rising financial rewards of running a modern multinational have been well publicised, executive recruiters say the pressures of the job have also been ratcheted upOn approaching his 60th birthday...

Read more

UK Uncut loses legal challenge over Goldman Sachs tax... While judge agreed the deal was 'not a glorious episode in the history of the Revenue', he ruled it was not unlawfulCampaign group UK Uncut Legal Action has lost its high court challenge over the legality...

Read more

The Frankfurt school, part 8: where do we go from here? | Peter Thompson

Category : Business

Our current state of economic dislocation and rise of the far right mirrors the school’s two periods. We must overcome with reason

The final question for this series is whether any of the issues brought up by the Frankfurt school still have any currency or importance. There are two distinct periods in the work of the Frankfurt school. On the one hand there is the attempt to explain and understand fascism as it was arising during the Weimar Republic. This was a period of social, economic and political dislocation that brought to the fore very real material concerns on the part of workers that could easily be channelled into a traditional search for scapegoats and simple explanations. During this period, however, there continued to exist a powerful workers’ movement in the form of social democracy and communism which, had it been able to overcome the timidity of the former and the strategic incompetence of the latter, could have functioned as a bulwark against the rise of the extreme right.

The second period is that of the postwar years, in which there was a social consensus that was formed under the umbrella of the cold war and rising prosperity (what the French call Les Trente Glorieuses) and in which it was declared that class and class struggle had come to an end. Frankfurt school theories about commodification, alienation, reification and false consciousness were revived by the 1968 movement as a way of explaining away the apparent passivity of the working class. Indeed, it was during this period that the working class began to be seen as part of the problem rather than the solution. The forward march of labour was halted, social democratic and communist parties accommodated to the new consensus and, as the philosopher André Gorz had it, it was “farewell to the working class”.

Since the mid-70s, however, we have again been living in a different world in which the automatic prosperity and growth of the postwar decades have disappeared. Real wages have fallen at the same time that productivity has risen, thereby transferring unimaginable wealth to the richest in society. Estimates of how much money is stashed in offshore accounts vary between $12 and $32tn – enough wealth to wipe out almost all the social problems of poverty in one fell swoop were it to be confiscated, socially invested and redistributed.

The problem now is that the two original periods that characterised the battleground for the Frankfurt school exist at one and the same time. We have the economic dislocation of the Weimar period with rates of unemployment in Europe rising constantly (Spain, for example, has reached over 50% youth unemployment), which is feeding into a rise of neo-fascist and rightwing parties from Golden Dawn to Ukip. At the same time there is a supine centre-left which is tied into the neoliberal agenda, while a fractured and fragmented “communist” movement (for want of a better word) has failed to put together a convincing alternative.

The great recession since 2008 has stripped away a lot of the illusions people have about the society they live in. When a government needs to proclaim that “we are all in this together”, then it is clear what the true subtext actually is.

But perhaps even more seriously, the planet itself can no longer afford the constant expansion required by capital. We have the technological and financial means to solve pretty well all of the basic problems of humanity. What we don’t have is the political will. But that is only missing because even our hopes for the future have become privatised and commodified. Our dreams have been bought up and sold back to us as glittery tat and royal weddings. It has often been said that it is easier now to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine a better one.

But this was true at the start of the Frankfurt school. Theodor Adorno wrote:

“The prospective fascist may long for the destruction of himself no less than for that of the adversaries, destruction being a substitute for his deepest and most inhibited desires … He realises that his solution is no solution, that in the long run it is doomed. Any keen observer could notice this feeling in Nazi Germany before the war broke out. Hopelessness seeks a desperate way out. Annihilation is the psychological substitute for the millennium – a day when the difference between the ego and the others, between poor and rich, between powerful and impotent, will be submerged in one great inarticulate unity. If no hope of true solidarity is held out to the masses, they may desperately stick to this negative substitute.”

That loss of hope and optimism about a better world is the most depressing outcome of the current crisis and it is no wonder that many seek refuge in the false nostalgia of an unspoiled world before the ravages of capitalism prompted “all that is solid to melt into air“.

But there is no way back, not least because the golden age never existed and the golden dawn will never come. The only way is to push forward using science, reason, intelligence and hope. Weak power may be good enough for now but at some point someone is going to have to flex muscle. Let’s make sure that it is the good guys and not the fascists again.

Bank of England official: Occupy Movement right about global recession

Category : Business

Andrew Haldane said protestors were correct to focus on inequality as the chief reason for 2008 economic crash

The Occupy Movement has found an unlikely ally in a senior Bank of England official, Andrew Haldane, who has praised protesters for their role in triggering an overhaul of the financial services sector.

Haldane, who oversees the City for the central bank, said Occupy acted as a lever on policymakers despite criticism that its aims were too vague. He said the protest movement was right to focus on inequality as the chief reason for the 2008 crash, following studies that showed the accumulation of huge wealth funded by debt was directly responsible for the domino-like collapse of the banking sector in 2008.

Speaking at a debate held by the Occupy Movement in central London, Haldane said regulations limiting credit use would undermine attempts by individuals to accumulate huge property and financial wealth at the expense of other members of society. Allowing banks to lend on a massive scale also drained funding from other industries, adding to the negative impact that unregulated banks had on the economy, he said.

The hard-hitting speech is unlikely to find a warm welcome in the Square Mile, which is keen for bank lending to recover to its heady pre-crisis levels and bring accompanying profits and commissions. Lending to individuals and corporations in the UK has fallen to a fraction of the levels seen in 2007 when few banks checked the income status of individual borrowers or the risks being taken by corporate customers before offering a loan. The Bank of England will impose stricter lending rules on banks next year when it takes over regulation of the industry from the Financial Services Authority.

Haldane said Occupy’s voice had been “loud and persuasive” and that “policymakers have listened and are acting in ways which will close those fault-lines” with a “reformation of finance that Occupy has helped stir”. He said inequality was fuelled by bank lending for speculation on property and other assets that enriched some in society at the expense of others.

“The asset-rich, in particular the owner-occupying rich, became a lot richer. Meanwhile, the asset-less and indebted fell further behind. In other words, the pre-crisis asset price bubble acted like a regressive tax,” he said.

Letter: Curbing speculation

Category : Business

In reply to Deborah Doane (Letter, 12 October), I can confirm that staff in my parliamentary office have met with the World Development Movement to discuss Mifid (the markets in financial instruments directive). Given my numerous commitments, it is not possible for me to take all the meetings I would wish, so often my staff take them on my behalf. This is normal practice in Brussels.

I am disappointed that the director of the World Development Movement does not appear to have taken the time to understand my views. As I have stated in numerous press releases, I believe in imposing hard limits on how many contracts or positions one market participant can hold at a time to curb speculation, and in having rigorous checks by national and European authorities on those who carry out genuine hedging.
Sharon Bowles MEP
Chair of the European parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee

Letters: New Bank of England governor will be the most powerful in British history

Category : Business

Your article (Tainted Tucker at head of queue for Bank job, 8 October) speculates on the shortlist for the next governor of the Bank of England from which George Osborne will make his pick over the next month or so.

It is generally accepted that the financial services bill, now going through parliament, will make this governor the most powerful in the history of our country, with wide-ranging powers and responsibilities to determine the future of our financial system and economic policy-making.

Yet this appointment remains in the hands of one man, the chancellor of the exchequer.

At the behest of the chancellor, Conservative backbench backwoodsmen have blocked my bill requiring the consent of parliament to this appointment, which was sponsored by a cross-party group of senior MPs.

To have the authority to drive through the effective reform of our financial system, the new governor will need to show he or she has the confidence of all parties and beyond.

Leaving this critical appointment solely in the hands of the chancellor risks tainting the new governorship from the outset with allegations of political bias or cronyism.
John McDonnell MP
Lab, Hayes and Harlington

• If Sharon Bowles gets the job of governor of the Bank of England, I hope she won’t bow to the influence of financial lobbyists and perpetuate the “light touch” approach to financial regulation that allowed the financial crisis to happen (Lib Dem MEP is surprise applicant for Bank governor, 10 October).

Unfortunately, her track record does not point in this direction. According to her website, in the first seven months of 2012, she had 29 meetings with financial sector lobbyists. Meanwhile, she refused to have a single meeting with members of the 11 World Development Movement groups in her south-east England constituency who wanted to discuss regulation to prevent financial speculation driving up food prices.

In 2010 her party stated: “We cannot build an economy on financial gambling. Radical reform of the financial infrastructure is needed.” But Bowles has continued to defend unbridled speculation on the price of food and other

Post to Twitter

Ed Davey raps ‘Tea Party’ Tories

Category : Business

An anti-green movement in the Tory party is threatening tens of billions of pounds of investment, Lib Dem Energy Secretary Ed Davey warns.

Here is the original post: Ed Davey raps ‘Tea Party’ Tories

Post to Twitter

Rallies Planned for Occupy Wall Street Anniversary – New York Times

Category : Stocks

The Associated Press
Rallies Planned for Occupy Wall Street Anniversary
New York Times
The crowd sat in a circle at the edge of Battery Park on Friday, as two young women held up a large map of the financial district that had been divided into sectors and marked with assembly points. They explained the plan for early Monday: protesters
Occupy Wall Street movement: Spent after first year?USA TODAY
Occupy protesters set to mark 1 yearSan Francisco Chronicle
Occupy Wall Street Celebrates First Year With `Carnival'Bloomberg
ABC News

Post to Twitter

GOP Platform: Same-Sex Marriage ‘An Assault’ On ‘Foundations Of Society’ – The New Civil Rights Movement

Category : Stocks

The New Civil Rights Movement
GOP Platform: Same-Sex Marriage 'An Assault' On 'Foundations Of Society'
The New Civil Rights Movement
by David Badash on August 28, 2012 The GOP's final language for their 2012 platform, that the Republican National Committee delegates will be voting on this week, can be read in full here. The platform, which runs 62 pages, is a testament to 19th

and more

Satellites in the shed? TEDGlobal announces the new DIY revolution

Category : Business

The latest edition of the ideas festival at Edinburgh was abuzz with the ‘maker movement’: a phenomenon that aims to take manufacturing out of factories and put it into people’s homes

Once upon a time, if you said you were doing a spot of DIY, everyone would know you’d be doing something involving wobbly ladders, pots of paint and, depending on the decade, either stripping your floors or recarpeting them.

No more. Or at least ladders and pots of paint might still be involved, but the end result could be a aerial drone you’ve built yourself. Or a biotech lab.

Last week’s TEDGlobal conference in Edinburgh – the festival known as “Davos for optimists” – shone a light on the DIY revolution – a movement that encompasses items ranging from manufacturing to synthetic biology to medicine. After a decade in which digital technologies have disrupted industries from music to the media, it’s capitalism itself that is now under attack. A decade ago, open-source software revolutionised the internet. Now the idea has entered the realm of physical things: open-source hardware. Why stop at making your own website when you can make your own PC? Or car? Or satellite?

Catarina Mota, a 38-year-old Portuguese PhD student, is typical of the new breed of DIYers, or, as they tend to call themselves, “makers”. She’s a member of a 40-strong “hackerspace” in New York – a co-operative workshop where members share tools such as laser cutters – and develops and makes “smart materials”, ones that can change colour when you touch them or react to voltage. In the three years since she began, the maker movement, fuelled in part by the rapidly decreasing cost of 3D printers – devices that create objects layer by layer out of liquid plastic – has become a phenomenon. Mota’s hackerspace, NYC Resistor, is one of the oldest, but there are now 1,500 in the world.

Like most makers, she’s self-taught. “A lot of people were doing these sorts of things as kids and then stopped,” she said. “As manufactured goods became cheaper, we became consumers. But now everything has changed. We don’t accept things as they are given to us. We make technology work for us. And we can make a living from it: it’s not just a hobby. It has the potential to change economics profoundly. Companies can compete on quality no matter what their size.”

At, you can download blueprints to make your own car; at there are designs for remote-controlled four-rotor helicopters and at, you can download plans for everything you need to build a civilisation – wind turbines, ovens, cement mixers, tractors, bioplastic extruders…

Marcin Jakubowski, the Polish-American TED fellow behind the ecology project, is a passionate advocate of the movement. “People are hungry for meaning They see problems with the economic, social and democratic systems and they think – WTF? … This is all about enterprise and low-cost access to blueprints and it will have profound effects on society: production is going to be in the hands of the people.”

If this sounds like Marxism, a world in which workers own the means of production, it is and it isn’t. One of the speakers at TEDGlobal, author Rachel Botsman from Sydney, who has coined the term “collaborative consumerism”, says: “It’s definitely capitalism. But it’s more democratic forms of capitalism.”

She points out that the website Airbnb, which allows anyone to run a bed and breakfast operation in their spare room, received a $1bn valuation last year “and only 30 companies in the world have ever done that” – and that, in the face of a broken financial system, other forms of venture capital, such as the crowdsourced finance site Kickstarter, have sprung up.

It’s also a phenomenon perfectly suited to the austerity age: mass unemployment, says Andrew Hessel, a biology futurist from California, might even be the necessary catalyst. “Before, people would just go and get a job in retail. Now that’s gone. There are millions of jobs that are not just coming back. But you can go and set up your own business for $100 and compete with the biggest companies out there.”

What’s more, the ideas, as evidenced by their high visibility at TED, are just starting to go mainstream. Bruno Giussani, the European director of TED who curated the programme, believes we are on the cusp of something radically new – not least because, according to Massimo Banzi, one of the founding fathers of the field, “you don’t have to ask for permission”.

Banzi is co-creator of the Arduino – a cheap, flexible, single-board computer that’s at the heart of thousands of DIY products, from a plant that will tweet you when it wants watering to the ArduSat, an Arduino-powered satellite.

“I made this little book to explain what I was doing and for the cover I took this image from a 1970s punk fanzine which said: ‘Here’s three chords, now form a band’,” says Banzi. “The DIY movement is tech punk. You can do what you want.

“Big companies limit your freedom. Look at the iPad. This is the TV set of the computer age. They’re designed for you to consume media. We have to teach children to make their own. Once you consume something, you accept these predetermined solutions.”

So, are the big corporations running scared? “Not yet. It’s still pretty scruffy and disorganised. But then, look at Apple. They were just a couple of hippies once.”

Build your own mobile phone network

Or maybe not. Though it’s possible: a drug cartel in Mexico has built its own encrypted network that operates across the country. As Marc Goodman of the Future Crimes Institute thinktank points out, technology is all very well, but it’s not always in the hands of the good guys. He worries that it’s not just schoolchildren and Brooklyn hipsters who are going to want to get their hands on DIY biotech. Criminals are always ahead of the curve, he says: drug dealers had cellphones long before Michael Douglas got his hands on one in Wall Street. ‘Weaponised flu’ and 3D-printed guns are what happens when DIY goes bad.

Become a venture capitalist (or borrow money from one)

Anyone can set up a business or have a creative idea. But raising the money to finance it is another thing. Existing forms of finance simply aren’t working – which is where new grassroots forms of lending come in.

Online collaboration has become a growing source of entrepreneurial capital. The US website is the most famous ‘crowdfunding’ site, with more than $230m pledged to different projects by private individuals, but there’s also for science projects, for technical ones and the British for social projects.

According to Botsman, it’s one of the main planks of the new DIY economy. “Kickstarter is lending more money than the US National Endowment for the Arts. It’s the greatest source of creative funding in the States.”

On 9 February, the site saw the first project to raise $1m – for an iPhone dock. Three months later, the Pebble, an internet-connected ‘smart watch’ with an e-paper screen like a Kindle’s, broke the $10m mark. You don’t need your bank manager’s permission any more; just the kindness (or savvy financial acumen) of strangers.

Study cryptography at Stanford

Failed your GCSEs? Dropped out of college? Fear not: Daphne Koller and her colleague at Stanford University in California, Andrew Ng, want to teach the world for free.

When Ng videoed his course on machine learning and put it online, more than 100,000 people signed up. That led he and Koller to develop an entire online learning platform with lectures, coursework, exams and certification. Choose between analytic combinatorics at Princeton, neuroethics at Penn State or cryptography at Stanford. It’s already being called an education revolution.

Make your own satellite

Remember the days when Nasa made rockets and the European Space Agency sent satellites into orbit? So old-fashioned! The latest innovation to be powered by the Arduino microcontroller – a palm-sized open-source computer co-created by Italian technologist Massimo Banzi – is the ArduSat, a DIY satellite that is the idea of a physicist and two aerospace engineers. No time to make your own? For $350 you can buy space on the ArduSat to conduct your own space science.

ArduSat is the latest in a long line of inventions powered by the Arduino, which was developed by Banzi with five friends while teaching at design school at Ivrea in Piedmont. You can download designs from the net or buy the board readymade. It has been used in countless ways, including in a glove that interprets sign language into words, a Geiger counter used to share radioactivity data after the Japanese tsunami, and the ArduPlane, an unmanned drone. And the ‘Enough Already’ controller, a device created by a Brooklyn DIYer called Matt Richardson to mute his TV whenever the words ‘Kim Kardashian’ are uttered.

“On the one hand, there are the people inventing things like a chair that will tweet when you fart,” says Banzi. “On the other, I’ve had some incredibly moving emails. There was a severely disabled man who couldn’t use a computer mouse until somebody made him a personalised Arduino version.

“Sometimes you need products you can’t find, or they exist but they’re too expensive. Tools like Arduino lower the barrier. More and more people are able to create.”

Do your own DNA testing

Genspace in Brooklyn, New York, was the world’s first community biotechnology laboratory, or ‘streetlab’, but the UK now has its own (MadLab in Manchester) and DIY molecular biology is a trend that is growing fast.

Ellen Jorgensen, Genspace’s co-founder, says the possibilities are endless. “It’s impossible for me, as a mainstream scientist, to imagine what an artist, an architect or even a lawyer may come up with when they get their hands on this technology.”

Jorgensen believes everybody should have the chance to do science, and says molecular biology is one of the most exciting branches out there: “It’s primal. You are literally engineering yourself.”

More practically, one of Genspace’s early users DNA-sequenced dog excrement on a local pavement and tracked down the offending dog.

Print your own 50-cent microscope

The problem with doing a lot of science at home is that the equipment – supercomputers, rocket launchers etc – can be pricey. Which is why Manu Prakash and his team at Stanford have developed a new type of microscope: it can be printed out on paper and folded into shape and costs only 50 cents. It will be unofficially unveiled in a few weeks’ time, but Prakash, who grew up in India without a fridge, understands the power of microbes and wants children everywhere to be able to do the same.

Silvio Berlusconi hints at comeback bid

Category : Business

Disgraced former PM’s remarks fuel speculation that he is aiming to regain power on ticket of withdrawal from euro

He may have been jeered from office last year. He may be on trial accused of paying for sex with a 17-year-old girl. And last week a prosecutor in Milan asked for him to be locked up in jail for three years and eight months for allegedly shady business practices.

But this weekend, Italy was abuzz with speculation that Silvio Berlusconi is planning a comeback – and could return to lead the right into an early general election, perhaps as standard-bearer of a party bent on withdrawing Italy from the euro.

The media tycoon gave his clearest indication yet that he is planning a return at the end of last week, when he told an audience of young rightwingers: “I’m working on solutions. I’m still here.” And then, as if speaking from a campaign platform, he added: “Give me 51% [of the votes].”

His cry brought his audience to their feet, chanting: “Silvio, Silvio.” Speaking as if he had already taken back the leadership of the Freedom People, the movement he founded in 2007, Berlusconi said he intended to change its name and ensure that half its candidates at the next election were women.

It was the latest in a succession of interventions that have Italy’s political class wondering about a Berlusconi comeback in a more eurosceptic guise. The former prime minister recently warned that Germany “should get out of the euro, or others will do so”. Last week, he said that regaining its own currency would have advantages for an export-led economy such as Italy’s.

It’s all a far cry from Berlusconi’s ignominious exit last November, when, having governed Italy for eight of the previous 10 years, he handed in his resignation to the strains of “hallelujah” from a crowd outside the presidential palace.

By then, a flood of leaked claims about his “bunga bunga” parties, including allegations of half-naked showgirls dressed up as nuns and policewomen, had turned the billionaire politician into a figure of international ridicule. In the final weeks of his leadership, fellow EU leaders made strenuous efforts to avoid being photographed with him, and almost his only high-level friendship was an intensely controversial one with Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin.

Berlusconi’s party still has the votes in parliament to bring down the unelected technocratic government led by Mario Monti. A snap vote in the autumn would have effects far beyond Italy, because it would bring down the curtain on Monti and his team, put into office last November to pass unpopular measures demanded by Italy’s eurozone partners that Berlusconi’s government had been reluctant to introduce. Their fall would almost certainly plunge the euro into renewed crisis.

The yield on Italian government bonds – a benchmark indicator that moves in the opposite direction to confidence in an economy – has been creeping higher since mid-March, though the rate dipped last week to close on Friday night at 5.77%. Berlusconi said the rise in Italy’s borrowing costs showed that, since he left office, “the situation has not changed”.

Some observers doubted whether the TV magnate could reverse his decision to hand the leadership of the party to his former justice minister, Angelino Alfano. But his chief opponent when he was in government did not rule it out.

Pierluigi Bersani of Italy’s main leftwing group, the Democratic party, quoted an old Italian proverb: “There’s no limit to the worst.” Ironically, the PD leader was himself presented at the weekend with a new and powerful leadership challenge.

Italy’s colourful but long-stagnant political scene has been thrown into confusion in recent weeks by the seemingly unstoppable ascent of the Five Star movement, founded by the comedian and blogger Beppe Grillo. Its growing success has gone hand in hand with mounting dissatisfaction with Italy’s mainstream politicians and increasing anger over an economy that has been stalled for more than 10 years.

The Five Star movement’s programme makes no reference to the euro. But Grillo has described the single currency as an “ever-tightening noose” and said Italy’s exit ought not to be taboo.

A poll released by the La7 television channel last week indicated that the Five Star movement could emerge from the next election as Italy’s second-biggest party, ahead of the Freedom People.

Introducing a further element of uncertainty to the political scene, the mayor of Florence, Matteo Renzi, who has been widely canvassed as the leader of a rejuvenated centre left, on Saturday threw down the gauntlet to the PD’s existing leaders. Naming one by one the party’s barons, the 37-year-old Renzi told a conference he had organised: “You’ve done much for the country, much for the party. But now Basta!

In a speech packed with metaphors of successful renewal, Renzi pulled out two cameras, each made by Polaroid. One, he said, took 10 minutes to produce a black-and-white photograph. The other could turn out a colour picture almost instantly.

The executives at Polaroid, “knew how to renew the brand”‚ said Renzi. “Let’s try it ourselves.” The PD is to hold a poll before the end of the year to select its candidate for prime minister.

The PdL is to do the same. But several political commentators and pollsters said there were marked differences between the two leadership struggles that appeared to be taking shape.Maurizio Pessato of the polling firm SWG said the face-off within the PD was taking place within a structured framework and would eventually lead to the choice of a leader accepted by all, or most, of the party. But, he said, “On the centre right the situation is a lot more difficult.” Berlusconi had stepped aside, but he was having second thoughts, a situation that was “putting the brakes on everything,” said Pessato.

Letters: Europe’s democratic deficit

Category : Business

Seumas Milne is right to condemn the undemocratic nature of the European project (In or out of the eurozone, we must ditch this failed model, 23 May). Yet when it comes to questions of complex economics, the left have a tendency to place too great an emphasis on referendums and elections.

The vast majority of people haven’t the time or energy to keep up with the daily shifts of the financial crisis, so referendums can offer little guidance on what is best for the electorate in terms of economic governance. Governments’ approach to the eurozone crisis should not be a question of direct democracy but of representative democracy. The people’s representatives must be expected, and pressured, to consider more carefully the wishes of the electorate in relation to economic minutiae that we the people cannot be expected to comprehend in full.

Electorates must, instead, be able to trust their representatives to respect their wishes. In Greece the electorate reject their government, reject austerity, but want to keep the euro. The people do not trust their representatives; this is the root of Europe’s democratic deficit.
Harriet Smith Hughes

• Gaby Hinsliff points out the perils of the Labour party fanning anti-EU sentiments (Beware, Ed, you stoke this anti-Europe fire at your peril, 22 May) by adding its voice to calls for an “in or out” referendum on the UK’s continued membership of the European Union. But it may well be the only means of ensuring at long last an informed nationwide debate on Britain’s place in the changed Europe that will eventually emerge from the ashes of the eurozone crisis. If Britain is to stop sleepwalking towards isolation and loss of influence, a start needs to be made now and a lead given – by Labour, and also by the Lib Dems, if they could only unshackle themselves – to promote responsive and accountable institutions and progressive and socially responsible policies for the EU. That would be the best way of safeguarding Britain’s interests in Europe.
David Harley
Twickenham, Middlesex

• Promising a referendum on British membership of the EU would show how low Ed Miliband will stoop for a supposed tactical advantage. In 2005 there was a legitimate and compelling reason to put the proposed European constitution to a popular vote. Now there is only a scheme to outflank the Conservatives on their own right wing. It may seem very clever in Westminster circles, but the political stature of anyone who aspires to lead a whole nation cannot be built on bluff and manoeuvre.
Roger Woodhouse
Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands

• Christopher Denne of the European Movement says the UK is now marginalised in Europe and that the pro-Europeans “saw it coming” (Letters, 22 May). However, if the European Movement’s views had been heeded, the UK would be part of the euro, and we would be in a far worse position than we are.

An ideological enthusiasm for European unity blinded too many people, including the European Movement, to the simple fact that one currency (and therefore one interest rate and no possibility of devaluation) for several economies does not work in the long term.

As a consequence, millions of people in Greece, and to a lesser extent in Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Italy, are suffering devastatingly high rates of unemployment and wage cuts. The pain will continue until participating countries dismantle this foolish project.
Richard Mountford
Hildenborough, Kent

• There is an almost instant revisionism going on with the reassertion of German economic competitiveness. The story is being told that the sacrifices that were made over the past 15 years were a conscious effort to increase competitiveness in the international economy. This is a byproduct. Those sacrifices were made to facilitate German reunification. The resistance of the current German government to any generosity on behalf of the “euro periphery” makes it look as if they only care about the Volk.
R Raeburn